Friday, May 13, 2011

Blogger releases injunction ZAM v CFW


According to the Mirror,

“A blogger who published the full text of a gagging order online has said he did so because he does not agree with the idea that people should be able to go to court to silence others.”

The blogger – who is not being named for legal reasons – said he had not yet heard from any lawyers representing ZAM, but was not worried, as he had no money to pay a fine, and did not believe that he would be jailed.

Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/latest/2011/05/13/blogger-publishes-gagging-order-115875-23127867

So we thought we would have a look for it. Bah humbug. Its on Blogger and that has been down for days …

So we found it somewhere else at http://www.scribd.com/doc/55258661/ZAM-vs-CFW-TFW-Hyper-Injunction. However, please note that if you do view this document YOU WILL BECOME PARTY TO IT AND WILL BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND YOU MUST NEVER MENTION IT TO ANYONE EVER AGAIN. You have been warned.

If you want to read about the case, it is here at http://guernseytrustvictims.blogspot.com.

[UPDATE]

The Blogger who the media cannot name is back up on http://jailhouselawyersblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/zam-vs-cfw-tfw-hyper-injunction.html (SAME CONDITIONS APPLY….)

2 comments:

  1. Should everyone who reads this send an email to the lawyers whose details are listed to ask how to proceed next?

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's sticking his neck out. Subject to a life sentence and could conceivably be recalled. There's an old saying, advice given to junior officers in the Armed Forces... 'Do not issue an order if you are not confident it will be obeyed.'

    ReplyDelete